SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3213

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J.
Mohammad Ali – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Manisha Dhawan – Respondent
CM(M) 462 of 2023
Decided On : 03-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjeev Bhatia and Ms. Sunita Rani, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. B. Khan and Mr. Anurag Bindal and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates alongwith Husband of applicant, for the Respondent.

The court has the discretion to allow the advancement of hearing and set aside orders declining to take pleadings on record, subject to specified conditions.

Headnote:

Advancement of Hearing - Civil Procedure - The court allowed the advancement of hearing with the consent of the parties, set aside the impugned order declining to take the written statement on record, and directed the petitioner to file the written statement and affidavit of admission/denial of documents within specified timelines.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the trial court's order declining to take the written statement on record in a civil suit for recovery of possession, arrears of rent, and mesne profits.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the impugned order, directed the petitioner to file the written statement and affidavit of admission/denial of documents within specified timelines, and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the petitioner.

Issues: Advancement of hearing, delay in filing written statement, setting aside the impugned order, and filing of affidavit of admission/denial of documents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the submissions of the parties, allowed the advancement of hearing, and directed the petitioner to comply with specified timelines for filing the written statement and affidavit of admission/denial of documents.

Final Decision: The present petition was allowed, and pending applications, if any, were disposed of.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral):

CM APPL. 39341/2023

1. This is an application filed by the Respondent seeking advancement of hearing. The matter is listed on 12.10.2023.

2. Issue notice. The learned counsel for the Petitioner accepts notice.

2.1. He states he has no objection to the advancement of hearing.

3. Accordingly, the application is allowed and with the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing today.

CM(M) 462/2023

4. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 20.12.2022 passed by the ADJ-08, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court') in CS DJ 412/2022 titled as "Manish Dhawan v. Mohammad Ali" whereby the Trial Court declined to take the written statement of the Petitioner on record.

4.1. The Petitioner is the defendant and the Respondent is the plaintiff in the civil suit. The Plaintiff has filed the civil suit for inter-alia recovery of possession, arrears of rent and mesne profits.

5. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner herein was served with the copy of the summons on 25.02.2022 and the written statement was filed belatedly on 02.09.2022 without any application for condonation of delay.

5.1. He states that the delay in filing the written statement occurred on account of the eye surgery of the erstwhile counsel engaged by the Petitioner.

5.2. He states that the Petitioner herein be permitted to place his written statement on record and the Respondent be compensated with the legal costs as otherwise, the Petitioner herein will suffer great prejudice as his defence will not come on record.

5.3. He states that in fact after receiving the written statement, the Respondent herein has already filed an application under Order XII Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure (`CPC') relying upon the averments made said written statement and for this additional reason, reference to the same will become necessary while addressing arguments on the Respondent's application filed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

5.4. He states that the Petitioner undertakes not to seek any unnecessary adjournment before the Trial Court and cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the suit.

6. In reply, the learned counsel for the Respondent states that though he does not admit that the Petitioner has any reasonable grounds for filing the written statement belatedly, he states, however, with a view to expedite his trial, he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside, so that, his application filed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and Orders XXXIX Rule 10 CPC can be heard at the earliest.

6.1. He states that the date of service of summons on the defendant is 25.05.2022 and the date of filing the written statement is 27.09.2022.

7. This Court has considered the submissions of the Parties and perused the petition.

8. In view of the submissions made by the parties, the impugned order is set aside and the Petitioner's written statement filed on 02.09.2022/27.09.2022 is directed to be taken on record, subject to the Petitioner making a payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the Respondent within a period of ten (10) days.

9. The Petitioner is directed to file his affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed by the Plaintiff within a period of ten (10) days. The undertaking of the Petitioner recorded at paragraph 5.4 is taken on record and he is bound down to the same.

10. Replication, if any, be filed by the Respondent within four (4) weeks after receipt of the affidavit of admission/denial of documents.

11. It is made clear that if the Petitioner fails to file affidavit of admission/denial of documents within the time sought from this Court and/or fails to pay the costs, his right to file the written statement shall stand struck off, without seeking any clarification from this Court. No application for extension of time will be entertained.

12. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is allowed. Pending applications, if

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top