SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3214

MINI PUSHKARNA
Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Satish Jain – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Vinayak Thakur, Advocates, for the Plaintiff in CS(OS) 182 of 2017 with Cr. M.A. 7383 of 2018, I.A. Nos. 8839 of 2018, 10357 of 2018, 5927 of 2019, 6198 of 2019, 8565 of 2021 & 13217 of 2021, 19322 of 2022.
Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Shaurya Pushpam, Advocates, for the Defendant-1 in CS(OS) 182 of 2017 with Cr. M.A. 7383 of 2018, I.A. Nos. 8839 of 2018, 10357 of 2018, 5927 of 2019, 6198 of 2019, 8565 of 2021 & 13217 of 2021, 19322 of 2022 & for the Defendant-2 in CS(OS) 261/2019 & I.A. Nos. 7089/2019, 7090/2019, 8758/2019, 10878/2019 & 10879/2019 & Crl. M.A. 13012/2019 & EX.P. 50/2018 & Ex. APPL. (OS) 683/2020.
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sukant Vikram and Mr. Raghav Bhatia, Advocates, for the Defendant-3 to 6 in CS(OS) 182 of 2017 with Cr. M.A. 7383 of 2018, I.A. Nos. 8839 of 2018, 10357 of 2018, 5927 of 2019, 6198 of 2019, 8565 of 2021 & 13217 of 2021, 19322 of 2022 in CS(OS) 261/2019 & I.A. Nos. 7089/2019, 7090/2019, 8758/2019, 10878/2019 & 10879/2019 & Crl. M.A. 13012/2019.
Mr. Rahul Shukla, Advocate, for the Defendant-1 in CS(OS) 261/2019 & I.A. Nos. 7089/2019, 7090/2019, 8758/2019, 10878/2019 & 10879/2019 & Crl. M.A. 13012/2019.
Mr. Om Prakash Shekhawat, Advocate, for the Defendant-1A and 1B in CS(OS) 261/2019 & I.A. Nos. 7089/2019, 7090/2019, 8758/2019, 10878/2019 & 10879/2019 & Crl. M.A. 13012/2019.
Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Vinayak Thakur, Advocates, for the Defendant-3 in CS(OS) 261/2019 & I.A. Nos. 7089/2019, 7090/2019, 8758/2019, 10878/2019 & 10879/2019 & Crl. M.A. 13012/2019.
Ms. Sayantani, Advocate, for the Judgment Debtor-1 in EX.P. 50/2018 & Ex. APPL. (OS) 683/2020.
Mr. Rajesh Banati, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Sareen and Mr. Harsh Gupta, Advocates, for the Judgment Debtor-2 and 3 in EX.P. 50/2018 & Ex. APPL. (OS) 683/2020.

JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J.

CRL.M.A. 7383/2018 in CS(OS) No. 182/2017

1. The present is an application on behalf of defendant No. 1 under Section 340 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') against plaintiff on the ground that the present suit filed on behalf of plaintiff is a gross abuse of the process of law and has been filed by plaintiff with dishonest and mala fide intention. The present application has been filed on the premise that plaintiff has verified the suit and has sworn the accompanying affidavit, fully knowing that the contents of the same are false even to his knowledge. Hence, by making false statements `On Oath' before this Court, plaintiff has made himself liable to be proceeded under Section 340 of Cr.P.C.

2. Though the present application has been filed under Section 340 Cr.P.C., however, at the outset, at the commencement of the arguments, learned Senior Counsel for defendant No. 1 submitted that the submissions made qua this application would be made treating the present application as an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC'), for rejection of plaint. Thus, submissions have been advanced by all the parties on the issu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top