SANJEEV SACHDEVA, MANOJ JAIN
Krishna Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Petitioner impugns order dated 22.07.2023 whereby petitioner has been posted to join a new Battalion immediately.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was posted to Halduchaur, Uttarakhand on 11.05.2021 and is sought to be posted out before the expiry of the normal tenure of three years. He further submits that the petitioner's daughter is a student and as such the posting will disrupt her education.
3. We find no merit in the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner should not have been posted out prior to expiry of the normal tenure of posting of three years, for the reasons that the normal period of three years is not mandatory. In case of exigencies of service and interest of the service, said period can be curtailed and posting order can be issued prior to expiry of the period of three years.
4. Respondents have sought to post the petitioner to a newly created Battalion where fresh manpower is required. Petitioner is a mason and his services are required for the newly created Battalion.
5. Petitioner has already completed over two years of his tenure in Uttarakhand. Further we may note th
The normal tenure for posting is not mandatory and can be curtailed for exigencies of service.
The needs and necessities of an individual in the Armed Forces are subservient to the needs of the Army, and postings are determined based on various factors, balancing the needs of the service with ....
Transfer and posting decisions in a disciplined force are made by the competent authority in the interest of the Force, and individual requests for specific locations may not be entertained.
The central legal point established is that the transfer of the petitioner was in accordance with the Standing Order 07/2014, which governs postings upon promotion.
Discretionary power of competent authority in transfer orders is not to be interfered with unless shown to be arbitrary or mala fide.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that unless arbitrariness is shown, the court should refrain from interfering in transfer and posting orders, especially in the case of armed force....
The court balanced the petitioner's family health issues and impending retirement with the concession granted for seeking a terminal posting, in deciding not to interfere with the posting order.
The court upheld the authority's discretion in transfer decisions, emphasizing the need for demonstrating arbitrariness for judicial intervention in military postings.
Administrative authorities must adhere to established standing orders regarding personnel transfers, and courts must respect compliance with procedure unless clear irregularity is shown.
The court directed that transfer requests be considered sympathetically based on personal circumstances such as remaining service duration and family medical needs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.