SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Vipin Kumar Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan – Respondent


Table of Content
1. impugning transfer order and circumstances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's request for consideration on proximity. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court directs sympathetic consideration. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. decision on direction to be expedited. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 29.09.2022 whereby the Tribunal has declined to grant an interim protection to the petitioner and adjourned the matter to 25.11.2022 for completion of proceedings before the Registrar.

2. Petitioner in the Original Application had impugned an order of transfer dated 18.08.2022 whereby the petitioner was transferred from Kendriya Vidyalaya Roorkee to Kendriya Vidyalaya Pathankot.

3. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner has less than two years of service remaining and his wife is working for the Government of Uttarakhand and is presently posted at Khanjarpur, Roorkee and further that his wife is also requiring medical attentions from time to time.

4. On 07.10.2022, learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted, without prejudice to the rights and contentions, that he was willing for a posting but had requested the respondent to consider posti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top