SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Assem Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Ashi Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J. The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed by the appellant against the impugned Order dated 31.03.2022 vide which the application filed by the appellant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed.
2. The facts in brief are that a petition under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (`Act of 1955', in short) was filed for annulment of marriage on behalf of Ms. Ashi Kumar (who was the petitioner in the petition before the learned Judge, Family Courts and shall be referred as `respondent' in the present Appeal). The respondent, a permanent resident of Ghaziabad got married to Mr.Assem Aggarwal, resident of New Zealand, (who was the defendant in the petition before the learned Judge, Family Courts and shall be referred as `appellant' in the present Appeal) on 04.10.2009 according to Hindu Rites and Customs at Railway Officers' Club, Sardar Patel Marg, New Delhi.
3. The appellant at the time of marriage was staying at Le Meridian Hotel, New Delhi. Before marriage, it was represented by the appellant's family that they would demand no dowry and the respondent was also led
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.