IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Ali Varis – Appellant
Versus
The State NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5630 of 2023
Decided On : 09-08-2023
Settlement Agreement - Quashing of FIR - The court allowed the quashing of the FIR and all proceedings arising from it based on the amicable settlement reached between the parties, emphasizing the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the court process in cases of matrimonial differences.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition to quash FIR No.0421 dated 01.10.2020 registered under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC, stating that the parties had resolved their disputes amicably and entered into a settlement agreement.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had reached an amicable settlement and were living together peacefully, leading to the quashing of the FIR and all proceedings arising from it.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should quash the FIR and proceedings based on the amicable settlement between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the court process, particularly in cases of matrimonial differences where parties have reached an amicable settlement.
Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No.0421 dated 01.10.2020 registered under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC at PS Patel Nagar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 21212/2023 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 5630/2023
1. The present petition has been filed for quashing FIR No.0421 dated 01.10.2020 registered under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC at PS Patel Nagarand all the proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 16.06.2014 in accordance with the Muslim Rites and Ceremonies. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately since May 2018.
3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, with theintervention of the family members of both the petitionerNo. 1 and the Respondent no.2, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and agreed to livetogether and on 03.06.2021 the Respondent no.2 joined the conjugal company of the Petitioner no.1 and since then she is living with the Petitioner no.1. In furtherance thereof parties have entered into a settlement agreement/MOU dated 10.07.2023.
4. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash FIR No.0421 dated01.10.2020 registered under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC at PS Patel Nagar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
5. I have gone through the settlement dated 10.07.2023 which has been placed on record. The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:
(a) The complainant/wife has already joined the company of the second party/husband on 03.06.2021 and thereafter they are residing together at Ghaziabad,U.P.
(b) It is agreed between the parties that all the present case and the connected cases shall be withdrawn either or appropriate petition for quashing shall be filed with the cooperation of each other.
(c) It is agreed between the parties that any other litigation, if any, (even not mentioned in the above mentioned connected cases) pending before the Courts/Authority shall be withdrawn/quashed.
(d) It is also agreed that both the parties shall live together peacefully, harmoniously and amicably and they will give due love and respect to each other and their family members.
6. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
7. Both parties are present in court and have duly been identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force or coercion. Since the marriage between the parties has also been resolved and now they are staying together, she has no objection if FIR No.0421 dated 01.10.2020 registered under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC at PS Patel Nagar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
8. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, this court considers that the parties have entered into an amicable settlement out of their own free will, without any fear, force or coercion and they should be given an opportunity to lead their lives peacefully. No purpose will be served in continuing with the trial.
9. In view of the above, FIR No.0421 dated01.10.2020 register
The court can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, particularly in cases of matrimonial differences where parties have reached an amicable settle....
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the parties, especially in cases of matrimoni....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The court emphasized the use of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court, particularly in cases of amicable settlement....
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes based on amicable settlements and mutual divorce decrees.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, especially in cases arising out of matrimonial dif....
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
High Courts can quash non-compoundable offences in matrimonial disputes if parties reach an amicable settlement, as established in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana and other precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.