IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Prajol Biswal & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State NCT of Delhi Through Sho Ps Sarita Vihar & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 879 of 2023
Decided On : 13-02-2023
Quashing of FIR - Matrimonial Dispute - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - 498A/406/34 IPC - B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179; Jasmair Singh and Another vs. State of Haryana and Another, (2022) 9 SCC 73
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.0360/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, citing amicable settlement and pending divorce proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the Settlement Agreement and the absence of grievances between the parties, and relied on precedents to quash the FIR and its proceedings.
Issues: Quashing of FIR in matrimonial dispute, applicability of Section 482 Cr.P.C., consideration of amicable settlement.
Ratio Decidendi: High Courts can quash non-compoundable offences in matrimonial disputes if parties reach an amicable settlement, as established in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana and other precedents.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No.0360/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and disposed of the petition.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A.3345/2023 (exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 879/2023
1. This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.0360/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the marriage between the parties took place on 29.04.2018. No child was born out of this wedlock. Thereafter, due to temperamental incompatibility disputes arose between the parties which resulted in the registration of the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with the intervention of well wishers and relatives, the matter has been amicably settled. The parties have also entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 01.12.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that pursuant to the settlement agreement, a petition for divorce vide mutual consent was filed and the first motion has already been passed vide order dated 01.12.2022. He submits that the petition for the second motion is fixed today itself. It is the case of the petitioners, that since no grievance of whatsoever nature is left between the parties, it will be in the interest of justice that the present FIR along with all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
3. Respondent No.2 is present in person and has duly been identified the respondent No.2. She states that she has entered into the settlement amicably without any fear, force and coercion with the petitioners.
4. I have gone through the Settlement Agreement dated 01.12.2022. The Settlement Agreement reveals that the parties have reached at the settlement as they could not live together on account of some temperamental differences.
5. The terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement reads as under:
"AND WHEREAS It is agreed between the parties that they shall dissolve their marriage by obtaining a decree of divorce by way of mutual consent/court decree in theconcerned court in Delhi.
AND WHEREAS It has been agreed between the parties that the petitioner No-1/wife towards full and final settlement of all her claims including Istridhan, maintenance (present, past and future) and permanent alimony, marriage articles/jewelry etc.
AND WHEREAS That the petitioner No-1/wife has received the full and final settlement of all her claims including Istridhan, maintenance (present, past and future) and permanent alimony, marriage articles/jewelry etc.
AND WHEREAS That the FIR will be quashing before the second motion. That the Petitioner No-1/complainant shall cooperate to give statement/NOC and to do all these acts which may be required to be done before concerned Hon' ble High Court for quashing of present FIR.
AND WHEREAS It is agreed that the parties shall withdraw their respective cases/complaints etc. from the courts/authorities concerned on their respective dates of hearing.
AND WHEREAS It is further agreed between the parties that after this settlement both the parties shall left with no right, title, or interest in the movable or immovable properties of each other or their family members and both the parties shall not file any cases, complaint or litigation against each other in future pertaining to the present marriage and shall cooperate with each other in execution of present settlement.
AND WHEREAS It is agreed that in case of default from either side in carrying out the terms of the settlement he/she shall be liable to pay Rs.50,000/- by way of penalty/compensation to the other Sides.
AND WHEREAS It is further agreed between the petitioner that after the settlement both of them have left with no right, title or interest in the movable and immovable properties of each other or their family members and both the parties shall not file any case, complaint or litigation against each other in future pertaining to the present marriage and shall cooperate with each other in execute of the settlement deed.
AND WHEREAS It is agreed between the petitioners that they will not interfe
High Courts can quash non-compoundable offences in matrimonial disputes if parties reach an amicable settlement, as established in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana and other precedents.
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the parties, especially in cases of matrimoni....
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties in m....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, especially in cases arising out of matrimonial dif....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, using inherent powers under section 482 of the Cod....
The court emphasized the use of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court, particularly in cases of amicable settlement....
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes based on amicable settlements and mutual divorce decrees.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.