SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Girish Kathpalia, JJ.
Vijay Sagar – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer Circle 52(1) & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7634 of 2023
Decided On : 02-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms Mitika Choudhary, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Sanjeev Menon, Jr. Standing Counsel.
Mr Ashish Batra, Senior Panel Counsel, for the Respondent/U.O.I.

The court's decision was influenced by the fact that a statutory appeal had been preferred after the order was passed, leading to the dismissal of the application seeking recall of the order.

Headnote:

Recall of Order - Statutory Appeal - The court dismissed the application seeking recall of an order, stating that since a statutory appeal had been preferred after the order was passed, the application was without merit.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition as the assessment order had been passed, with liberty to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as per law.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the application seeking recall of the order to be without merit and dismissed it.

Issues: Application for recall of order

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the fact that a statutory appeal had been preferred after the order was passed and concluded that the application was without merit.

Final Decision: The application seeking recall of the order was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM No.39136/2023

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM No. 39135/2023

2. This is an application filed seeking recall of order dated 30.05.2023.

3. A perusal of the order would show that the petitioner's counsel, i.e., Ms Mitika Choudhary, had made a submission before the Court that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, as the assessment order has been passed.

4. Since liberty was sought to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as per law, leeway in that behalf was granted.

5. It is not disputed by Ms Choudhary that since the order dated 30.05.2023 being passed, a statutory appeal has been preferred.

6. In our view, this application is completely without merit.

7. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

8. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top