SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Virender Chahal @ Virender – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
INDEX TO THE JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
I. Facts of the Case
II. The Investigation
ARGUMENTS ADDRESSED BEFORE THIS COURT
QUASHING OF FIR ON THE BASIS OF SETTLEMENT: PRINCIPLES TO BE FOLLOWED
I. General Principles
II. Can FIR registered under Section 376 of IPC be Quashed on the Basis of Compromise?
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
I. Circumstances Leading To Execution Of Settlement Agreement Between The Accused And The Victim In the Present Case
Contents of Settlement Agreement
II. Beyond Bargain: Can Monetary Consideration Become Ground for Quashing FIR Registered under Section 376 of IPC?
III. The Role of Learned Trial Court
CONCLUSION
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. At the threshold of adjudication in the present case lies an important question for consideration: Should this Court invoke its inherent powers to quash an FIR alleging commission of offence of rape, on the ground of matter having been compromised between the accused and the victim? What increases this dilemma is the revelation that the very suggestion to explore such a compromise emanated not from the disputing parties, but from the learned Trial Judge itself.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court, by way of present p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.