Back
GIRISH KATHPALIA
Naveen – Appellant
Versus
Akshma Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Girish Kathpalia, J. - By way of this petition, brought under the proviso to Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the petitioner/tenant has assailed order dated 01.05.2018 of the learned Additional Rent Controller, Central District, Delhi, whereby the belatedly filed application for leave to contest the proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act was dismissed and eviction order with respect to shop no. 3828, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the subject premises") was passed. On service of notice, the present respondent/landlord entered appearance through counsel. I heard learned counsel for both sides.
2. Briefly stated, circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows. On 23.02.2013, the present respondent filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act against the present petitioner with respect to the subject premises. The summons issued in the prescribed format were served on the present petitioner through registered post on 06.03.2013 and through ordinary process on 18.04.2013. The present petitioner filed his application seeking leave to contest on 03.05.2013, claiming that the summons were served on
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the delay in filing an application for leave to contest under the Delhi Rent Control Act must be beyond the tenant's control and a substantial....
The court emphasized the need for the summons to be duly served with a legible copy of the paper book and applied the dual test of reasons beyond control for the delay and the substantial case for co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to file an application for leave to contest despite the service of summons in the prescribed format justifies an eviction order un....
The court highlighted the importance of timely filing of application for leave to contest, valid reasons for extension, and the need for a substantial case for consideration of the application.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of ensuring the tenant's right to be heard before eviction by carefully examining the service of summons and scrutinizing each case ....
Failure to file an application seeking leave to defend within the statutory period under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, results in the deemed admission of the landlord's statement in the eviction ....
The tenant must apply for leave to contest within the statutory period, and the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to condone the delay in filing such an application.
In summary eviction proceedings, the landlord need only establish a title better than that claimed by the tenant, and the court must balance the rights of the landlord and the tenant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
