GIRISH KATHPALIA
Kulwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Ahuja – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Girish Kathpalia, J. - By way of this petition, brought under proviso to Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the petitioner/tenant has assailed eviction order dated 16.05.2023 passed by the Additional Rent Controller because the petitioner/tenant failed to file application for leave to contest the proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act. On notice of these proceedings, respondent/landlord entered appearance through counsel. I heard learned counsel for both sides and examined the digitized trial court record.
2. Briefly stated, circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows.
2.1. The present respondent claiming himself to be the owner of premises bearing no.AF-6A, Ground Floor, Janta Flats, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the subject premises") filed eviction petition against the present petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act, pleading that the present petitioner was inducted as a tenant in the subject premises on 01.05.2010 for a period of 11 months only but despite expiry of that period, he did not vacate the subject premises, so the present respondent filed a Civil Suit for recovery of possession, which was dismissed on th
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to file an application for leave to contest despite the service of summons in the prescribed format justifies an eviction order un....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of ensuring the tenant's right to be heard before eviction by carefully examining the service of summons and scrutinizing each case ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the delay in filing an application for leave to contest under the Delhi Rent Control Act must be beyond the tenant's control and a substantial....
The court highlighted the importance of timely filing of application for leave to contest, valid reasons for extension, and the need for a substantial case for consideration of the application.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a tenant must file an affidavit stating the grounds on which he seeks to contest the application for eviction and obtain leave from the Contro....
The tenant must apply for leave to contest within the statutory period, and the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to condone the delay in filing such an application.
Failure to file an application seeking leave to defend within the statutory period under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, results in the deemed admission of the landlord's statement in the eviction ....
The landlord's bona fide requirement should not be doubted, and the tenant must make out a case showing that the landlord would be disentitled from obtaining an eviction order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.