IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Pooja - Appellant
Versus
State of Gnct of Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 5923 of 2021
Decided On : 21-09-2023
COVID-19 Ex-gratia Compensation - Duty of Deceased Constable - Disaster Management Act, 2005 - [Disaster Management Act, 2005, Section 35] - The court discussed the provisions of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, specifically Section 35, which empowers the appropriate government to take measures for disaster management. The court emphasized that the deceased constable was deployed for COVID-19 duty as per the orders issued by the Chief Secretary, Delhi, exercising powers under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The court highlighted the importance of documentary evidence and specific orders to ascertain the deployment of the deceased constable for COVID-19 duty, as required by the Group of Ministers for decision on ex-gratia payment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, wife of late Constable Amit Kumar, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the ex-gratia amount of Rs.1 crore promised for the deceased constable's COVID-19 duty.
Finding of the Court:
The court empathetically considered the case, emphasizing the deceased constable's death during COVID-19 duty and the clear communication in the public domain regarding the promised ex-gratia amount. The court directed the matter to be placed before the Group of Ministers for a decision, which was subsequently deferred pending the submission of documentary evidence by the police department.
Issues: The issues revolved around the delay in releasing the ex-gratia amount promised for the deceased constable's COVID-19 duty, the requirement of documentary evidence for deployment, and the decision-making process of the Group of Ministers.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the deceased constable's COVID-19 duty, the clear communication of the promised ex-gratia amount, and the need for documentary evidence to ascertain deployment for COVID-19 duty.
Final Decision: The case was listed for further hearing, considering the repeated rejection of the petitioner's case and the importance of documentary evidence for the decision on ex-gratia payment.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner who is the wife of late Constable Amit Kumar who died on account of COVID-19 on 5th May, 2020.
3. Vide Cabinet Decision No.2835 dated 13th May 2020, the GNCTD decided that any person including doctors, nurses, paramedical staff, etc. who is deployed for COVID-19 duties, if expires by contracting the COVID-19 during discharge of the duty, their family shall be paid an ex-gratia amount of Rs.1 crore.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon a tweet by the Chief Minister of Delhi wherein the Petitioner's husband's contribution during COVID-19 was noticed, and it was announced that his family would be given an ex-gratia amount of Rs.1 crore.
5. The Petitioner submits that the said amount has not been given, even one year after the said tweet. Accordingly, the present petition was filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to release the aforesaid ex gratia amount of Rs.1 crore as promised by them.
6. Vide order dated 14th December 2022, it was directed as follows:
"5. Ld. counsel for the Petitioner submits that the orders issued by the Chief Secretary, Delhi during the COVID-19 pandemic, exercising powers under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 required Delhi Police personnel to be posted for COVID-19 duty across Delhi. Thus, it cannot be argued by the Respondents that the Petitioner's husband was not on COVID-19 duty. The ld. Counsel for the Petitioner further relies upon the tweet issued by the Chief Minister of Delhi and the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi from official twitter handles.
...
7. The present case requires an empathetic consideration. It is not in doubt that the Petitioner's husband - Sh. Amit Kumar had died during COVID-19 duty.
...
8. Further, there is clear communication and messaging in the public domain via social media which leaves no manner of doubt that the ex gratia amount of Rs.1 Crore was announced for the Petitioner's Husband. The press clipping to the same effect has been placed on record.
9. The Respondents ought not to resile from the clear announcement made for ex-gratia payment. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the compensation due to the Petitioner can no longer be delayed.
10. Accordingly, let the matter be placed before the aforementioned Group of Ministers as per the cabinet decision dated 13th March 2020. The decision taken shall be placed on record by 15th January, 2023"
7. On 4th September 2023, ld. ASC submitted that the GoM meeting to consider grant of COVID-19 ex-gratia compensation was scheduled for 13th September 2023.
8. In the GoM dated 13th September, 2023, a decision has been taken and the case of the Petitioner for ex-gratia payment has been deferred. The said recommendation reads as follows:
| S. No. | Details of the Deceased | Brief facts | Recommendation of the Committee |
| 1. | Name and designation of deceased | Constable Amit Kumar | As per directions of the Hon'ble High Court, the case of Late Constable Amit Kumar was placed before the Group of Ministers in the meeting. The Group of Ministers noted that it was mentioned by the Police Department that During the period of lockdown, he was deployed for ensuring the lockdown guidelines in exposed areas of Containment Zones and around Deep Chand Bandhu Hospital where a number of persons and patients of COVID-19+ were visiting, which were very high risk zones. However, no such documentary evidence/specific order of such deployment was provided by the police department to ascertain the above mentioned contentions. In the absence of appropriate document, it was difficult for the GoM to decide the case of Late Constable Amit Kumar. Therefore, the GoM has directed that the police department may be requested to provide the contemporaneous general diary/departure report etc. in r/o Amit Kumar as a proof of deployment for ensuring the above contentions on or before 15.09.2023. Afte |
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of documentary evidence to ascertain deployment for COVID-19 duty and the empathetic consideration of cases involving promised ex-g....
The government is obligated to honor its commitment to provide ex gratia payment of Rs. 1 Crore to families of employees who contracted COVID-19 while on duty.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the eligibility for compensation under the Cabinet decision for employees who die of the disease while on COVID-19 duty, emphasizing the nature ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the eligibility criteria for ex-gratia compensation under Cabinet Decision No. 2835 dated 13th May 2020, specifically in d....
The court affirmed the entitlement of ex-gratia compensation for police personnel who die while on COVID-19 duty based on cabinet decisions and required timely processing of claims.
Healthcare providers, including doctors, are entitled to ex-gratia compensation for COVID-19 duty as per the Cabinet Decision, and the entitlement should be promptly honored.
Interpretation of the Cabinet Decision No. 2835 and the determination of eligibility for ex-gratia compensation based on COVID-19 duties.
Government policies providing ex-gratia compensation to frontline workers during a pandemic must be interpreted liberally. Distinguishing between routine and emergency duties to deny benefits is arbi....
Clarity on the deployment for COVID-19 duty and adherence to the criteria for ex-gratia compensation under the Cabinet Decision are essential for granting compensation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.