IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Ct Gd Mukesh Kumar Mishra - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 12723 of 2023 & CM Appls. 50191-92 of 2023
Decided On : 26-09-2023
Termination - Low Medical Category - The court disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation with the concerned authority and directed that any adverse order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available in law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought quashing of a notice directing him to show cause as to why his services should not be terminated due to low medical category. The petitioner had sustained an injury resulting in the amputation of his right leg and had been continued in service under the Rehabilitation of Disabled Force Personnel Policy.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation with the concerned authority and directed that any adverse order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available in law.
Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner's services should be terminated due to low medical category despite the circumstances of his injury and continued service under the Rehabilitation of Disabled Force Personnel Policy.
Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the petitioner to file a detailed representation with the concerned authority and directed that any adverse order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available in law.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation with the concerned authority and any adverse order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available in law.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral) - Petitioner seeks quashing of notice dated 01.09.2023 whereby petitioner has been directed to show cause as to why his services be not terminated on account of low medical category.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had sustained an injury while returning home from a pilgrimage on account of a high voltage electric wire of 11000 volts falling on the bus in which he was travelling leading to severe burns. Consequently, the right leg of the petitioner was amputated. However, since sustaining of injury in 2014, petitioner was continued in service and subsequently given the benefit of the "Rehabilitation of Disabled Force Personnel Policy" dated 29.06.2018 and has been continuing in service till date. He submits that subject show cause notice has suddenly been issued without any change in circumstances. Learned counsel submits that since petitioner is not well-versed in law, he could not give a detailed response/representation, however, a short representation has been filed. He submits that petitioner would like to file a detailed representation. He further submits that show cause notice dated 01.09.2023 was received on 11.09.2023 giving him 30 days' time to file a representation.
3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal today.
4. Show Cause notice dated 01.09.2023 received on 11.09.2023 grants 30 days' time to the petitioner to file a representation, though petitioner has already filed a representation, 30 days' period from the receipt of notice has not yet expired and if calculated from the date of service of the notice, further 15 days are available to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, we dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation with the concerned authority on or before 16.10.2023. Respondent would be at liberty to thereafter dispose of the representation in accordance with law. In case any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, said order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available in law.
6. Petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.
7. Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
The court emphasized the right of the petitioner to file a detailed representation and directed that any adverse order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to a....
The court emphasized the importance of allowing the petitioner to provide a detailed representation and directed the respondent to handle the representation in accordance with the law, providing a tw....
Consideration of relevant standing orders and office memorandums in deciding employment-related matters.
Termination due to physical unfitness must comply with rehabilitation policies for injuries sustained in service.
Timely consideration of representations and right to seek remedies if aggrieved by the decision
Procedural fairness and timely decision-making are essential in disciplinary actions, ensuring that the right to defend is upheld.
Writ against show cause notice not entertainable absent lack of issuing authority.
Proper service of notice is essential in employment termination cases; publication alone is insufficient to meet procedural fairness requirements.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.