SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Rajneesh Lamba - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12749 of 2022
Decided On : 05-09-2022




Procedural fairness and timely decision-making are essential in disciplinary actions, ensuring that the right to defend is upheld.

Headnote:(A) SSB Act, 2007 - Section 10 - SSB Rules, 2009 - Writ petition for quashing show cause notice issued for termination of services - The petitioner challenged the notice on grounds of procedural delay and lack of decision-making - Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's reply within four weeks and refrained from taking any consequential action for a week after that decision. (Paras 3-6)

(B) Judicial Review - The court emphasized that procedural fairness must be maintained in disciplinary actions, and the right to respond must be ensured. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner received a show cause notice for potential misconduct based on which he submitted a defense, but no resolution was reached, prompting the writ petition.

Findings of Court:
The court instructed the respondents to make a decision on the petitioner’s reply and deferred any action for one week post-decision.

Issues: Whether the show cause notice and subsequent actions followed due procedural norms and whether the petitioner was given a fair chance to defend himself.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the authority must consider the petitioner’s explanation while ensuring procedural fairness, highlighting the necessity of timely decision-making.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. order to dispose of the petition and application. (Para 1 , 2 , 8)
2. challenging the show cause notice for service termination. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court directs timely decision on petitioner's response. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 38736/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 12749/2022 & CM APPL. 38735/2022 (stay)

3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of the show cause notice dated 20.05.2022 served upon him by the respondents for termination of his services by invoking powers under Section 10 of the SSB Act, 2007 read with Rule 19 of the SSB Rules, 2009 or any such order which may be passed by the respondents in pursuance of the said Show Cause Notice.

4. The case of the petitioner is that vide the show cause notice dated 20.05.2022 issued by Inspector General (Pers), Sashastra Seema Bal, New Delhi has observed as under:

    "6. NOW THEREFORE, you are hereby supplied with all relevant documents (enclosed) and called upon to submit in writing your explanation and defence in respect of the above allegation by 20th June, 2022 as to why action to terminate your service for misconduct should not be initiated against you under Rule 19 of SSB Rules, 2009. In case, you fail to file any reply within the stipulated period, it shall be presumed that you have nothing to put forth in your defence and action to terminate your services as per the said SSB Rules, 2009 shall be initiated against you ex-parte."

5. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted his reply dated 05.07.2022 to the said show cause notice, however, till date no decision has been taken by the respondents.

6. Keeping in view the averments made in the present writ petition and the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, we hereby direct the respondents to consider the said reply dated 05.07.2022 and reach at a decision within four weeks. If the decision is taken against the petitioner after considering the said reply, respondents shall not give effect to the said decision for a week from the date of the decision.

7. Needless to say that if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the said decision taken by the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

8. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition and pending application are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top