Back
SACHIN DATTA
Hda Flavours Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Daddy`s Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
ARB. A. (COMM.) 29/2023
1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 08.05.2023, passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator, disposing of the application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "A&C Act"), filed on behalf of the appellant (the claimant in the arbitration proceedings).
2. The Ld. Sole Arbitrator was appointed by this court vide order dated 10.02.2023, at the joint request of the parties while considering a petition under Section 9 of the A&C Act, filed on behalf of the appellant.
3. While appointing the Ld. Sole Arbitrator, this court directed that the said petition under Section 9 of the A&C Act would be placed before the Ld. Sole Arbitrator as an application under Section 17 of the A&C Act.
4. It is in the above background that the impugned order has been passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator disposing of the said application under Section 17 of the A&C Act.
5. The disputes between the parties have arisen in context of a Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) dated 29.01.2022, entered into between the parties.
6. Another agreement referred to as the "Consulting Agreement" dated 01.04.2022 was also executed between the parties; however, whe
The court emphasized the need for specific prayers or applications when considering restraints against parties and upheld the principle of safeguarding the rights of both parties in arbitration proce....
The enforceability of a negative covenant in a Franchise Agreement is determined by the nature of the shared sensitive and confidential information, and the court emphasized the prima facie nature of....
The court emphasized the arbitrability of certain disputes and the grant of injunctions based on a prima facie case of unauthorized trademark use.
Upon termination of agreements, the respondent had no right to use the brand/marks, and the petitioners were within their rights to seek an injunction. Delay in approaching the court did not defeat t....
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
A party seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act must demonstrate a manifest intention to invoke arbitration proceedings, which was not established by the petition....
The court ruled that failure to initiate arbitration proceedings within 90 days of an interim order vacates such order, impacting the validity of injunction applications.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
