IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J.
Ashok Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Satyawati - Respondent
RC.REV. 305 of 2019 & CM Appl.23740 of 2019 and 57026 of 2023
Decided On : 03-11-2023
Affixation of Use and Occupation Charges - Landlord-Tenant Dispute - RC.REV. 305/2019 & CM Appl.23740/2019 and 57026/2023 - The court directed the tenant to pay use and occupation charges at different rates for specific periods, subject to the final outcome of the petition. Default in payment would dissolve interim protection granted to the tenant.
Fact of the Case:
The landlord filed an application seeking affixation of use and occupation charges by the tenant for the demised premises. The tenant disputed the charges and the extent of occupation of the premises.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the tenant to pay use and occupation charges at different rates for specific periods, subject to the final outcome of the petition. Default in payment would dissolve interim protection granted to the tenant.
Issues: Dispute over use and occupation charges, extent of occupation of the premises by the tenant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the determination of use and occupation charges for the demised premises and the extent of occupation by the tenant.
Final Decision: The court directed the tenant to pay use and occupation charges at different rates for specific periods, subject to the final outcome of the petition. Default in payment would dissolve interim protection granted to the tenant.
JUDGMENT
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J. (Oral)
CM Appl. 42777/2023 [Application seeking affixation of user and occupation charges]
1. This is an application filed by the Respondent/landlord seeking affixation of use and occupation charges.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant submits that reply to the application was filed. Reply is, however, not on record.
2.1. On steps being taken, let the Reply be brought on record. A hard copy of the Reply has been handed across by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant, today.
3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant submits that the premises in issue admeasures 100 sq. yds. in the residential area, consisting of Four Rooms, Verandha (used as kitchen), Court yard on the first floor, and One Tin Shed Room and Washroom on the Second Floor [hereinafter referred to as "demised premises"] and is on the right had side of building at premises no. 2922, Ward No. XII, Arya Pura, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-110007.
3.1. Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord further seeks to rely on affidavit filed by the LRs of the Respondent placing on record rent receipts in the sum of Rs.15,000/- per month, of the same building on the left had side. However, it is fairly contended by the Respondent/landlord that given the fact that building is old, the use and occupation charges should not be more than Rs.10,000/- per month.
4. It is contended by learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant that the premises is old and only consists of a shed, bathroom and a common space. It is further contended that on the first floor, another tenant is occupying one room and one kitchen and the toilet is built on the second floor which is being used by all occupants.
4.1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant has handed across the photographs of the demised premises to show the condition of the demised premises.
5. The premises in issue are residential premises admeasuring approximately 100 sq. yds. The Eviction Petition defines the demised premises as follows:
"Right side portion of premises consisting of 4 rooms, varandha (used as kitchen) and Court yard on the first floor and one tine shed room and latrine on the second floor."
6. The documents relied upon by the Respondent are for premises which form part of the demised premises bearing the same municipal number and is on the left side, first floor of the building while the demised premises is on the right side, first floor of the building.
7. In these circumstances, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the directions as set forth below are passed.
7.1. The Petitioner/tenant shall pay to the Respondent use and occupation charges in the following manner during the pendency of the Revision Petition:
(i) The use and occupation charges for the period from 14.06.2019 to 31.03.2020 shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant at the rate of Rs.7,500/- per month;
(ii) The use and occupation charges for the period from 01.04.2020 to 31.03.2022 shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant at the rate of Rs.6,000/- per month; and
(iii) The use and occupation charges for the period from 01.04.2022 to 31.10.2023 shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per month; and
(iv) The use and occupation charges from 01.11.2023 onwards, shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant at the rate of Rs.8,500/- per month, on or before 7th day of each calendar month;
(v) The use and occupation charges as set forth in paragraphs 7.1 (i), (ii) and (iii) shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant to the Respondent in four instalments, i.e., on 15.12.2023, 31.01.2024, 15.03.2024 and 30.04.2024.
8. All payments shall be made into the bank account of the Respondent/landlord. The details of the bank account shall be provided by the learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant on his email address within three days.
9. It is clarified that the use and occupation charges as affixed hereinabove are tentative and subject to the final outcome of th
The determination of use and occupation charges and the extent of occupation by the tenant are crucial in landlord-tenant disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of lease deeds, property location, and market rent in determining use and occupation charges, and the requirement of timely paymen....
The main legal point established is the requirement for a tenant to pay use and occupation charges at the market rate of similar premises till the final disposal of the petition, considering the fact....
The determination of user and occupation charges is based on the area, condition, and location of the demised premises, and the court has the authority to provide specific directions for payment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the tenant is required to pay the use and occupation charges at market rate till the final disposal of the petition, as per the legal principl....
The determination of mesne profits or compensation depends on the location, nature, and standard rate of rent, as guided by legal principles established in Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. vs. Federal Mo....
Tenant cannot claim himself/herself to be tenant qua the premises in question after passing of eviction order and courts after passing of eviction order can always put the tenant of premises to terms....
Enforcement of tenant's Undertaking for vacating premises and paying use and occupation charges.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the tenancy terminated with the passing of the eviction order, and the tenants were liable to pay use and occupation charges to reasonably com....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.