JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 13.02.2023 passed by ADJ, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court'), in CS DJ No. 612040/2016, titled as Duru Malik v. Suhagwati & Ors., allowing an application filed by the plaintiff i.e., Respondent No.1 under Order VII Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC') for bringing on record the additional documents.

1.1. The Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are defendant nos.2 and 3 respectively; the Respondent No.1 is the plaintiff before the Trial Court.

1.2. The Respondent No.1 has filed civil suit for recovery of possession and permanent injunction on 09.12.2011 with respect to property no. 11/9, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi.

1.3. The Trial Court vide order dated 13.02.2023 has opined that four (4) documents which the petitioners seeks to place on record at the stage of filing of the replication duly find mention in the plaint; and in these circumstances, the Trial Court has allowed the said application. The operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:

"The plaintiff has moved an application under Order 7 Rule 14 (3)