MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Npm Distributors – Appellant
Versus
Clide International Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 19.12.2022 passed by the District Judge (Commercial Court), North, Rohini, Delhi in CS (Comm) 282/22 (`Trial Court') whereby the Trial Court struck off the defence of the Petitioners herein.
1.1. The Petitioners are original defendant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff and Respondent No. 2 is defendant No. 4 before the Trial Court.
1.2. The commercial suit has been filed by Respondent No. 1 seeking recovery of Rs. 65,01, 674/- along with interest against the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 and is governed by provisions of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (`Act of 2015').
2. The Trial Court in its order dated 19.12.2022 recorded that the Petitioners herein have failed to file their written statement within the statutory period of 120 days and further, no application was preferred before the Trial Court for seeking enlargement of time to file the written statement. In view of the said facts, the Trial Court as per Order VIII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (`CPC') as amended by the Act of 2015 struck off the defence of th
Failure to comply with the statutory period for filing a written statement and failure to approach the Trial Court for supply of the paper book can lead to the forfeiture of the right to file the wri....
The need to consider and dispose of cases on merits rather than technicalities, as emphasized in SCG Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and MN Automobile Private L....
The time for filing the written statement commences from the date when the suit along with the documents is provided to the defendant, and the delay in filing the written statement may be condoned su....
Delay in filing a written statement can be condoned when within the overall condonable limits, prioritizing justice over technicalities.
Procedural law should advance substantial justice, and in case of conflict, the court should lean towards substantial justice.
Failure to file the written statement and subsequent attempts to seek permission to file the same without justification may lead to dismissal of the petition and the impugned orders.
The interpretation of procedural rules regarding the filing of written statements and the discretion of the court to permit filing beyond the stipulated period based on sufficient cause.
Strict adherence to procedural deadlines for filing written statements is essential; ignorance of law does not excuse late filings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.