SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 160

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Prashant - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 4298 of 2023 & CM APPL. 37374 of 2023
Decided On : 25-01-2024

Advocates appeared:
Petitioner-in-person, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Mr. Raj Kumar Maurya, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr.Manvinder Singh Shekhawat, Advocates for R-2.
Ms. Daisy Roy, Advocate for R-3.

IMPORTANT POINT
The eligibility of a sportsman to import specific firearms is determined by the Arms Act, 1959 and its prescribed criteria, including the Minimum Qualifying Score and participation in specific shooting events.

Headnote:

Sportsman - Import of Sports Pistol - Arms Act, 1959 - Schedule I

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a sportsman, sought permission to import a sports pistol or purchase it from a sports association. Disputes arose regarding the issuance of participation certificates, leading to the petitioner filing a writ petition. The court directed a review of the petitioner's age and participation, and the certificates were issued. However, the petitioner was denied permission to import the sports pistol, leading to the present petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, despite being a renowned shooter in the 10M Air Pistol category, did not meet the eligibility criteria to import a 0.22 or 0.32 bore sports pistol as per the Arms Act, 1959. The court upheld the respondent's stand that the petitioner must achieve a Minimum Qualifying Score in specific events to be eligible to import the sports pistol.

Issues: Dispute over the petitioner's eligibility to import a sports pistol under the Arms Act, 1959.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner's participation in the 10M Air Pistol category did not qualify him to import a 0.22 or 0.32 bore sports pistol. The court relied on the definition of 'renowned shooter' and the eligibility criteria specified in the Arms Act, 1959 to determine the petitioner's eligibility.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner's request to import the sports pistol was denied.

JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to import 0.22 and 0.32 a pardini sports pistol or in the alternative permit the Petitioner to purchase the same from Respondent No.2/Secretary General, National Rifle Association of India on the payment of the requisite charges.

2. The Petitioner claims to be a sportsman associated with the sport of Shooting. He states that he has been participating in various competitions in the 10M air pistol category. It is stated that during the last four years, the Petitioner has performed well at the National and the State level tournaments.

3. It is stated that the Petitioner was having disputes with Respondent No.2 and Respondent No.3 regarding issuance of his certificates of participation. It is the contention of the Petitioner that instead of issuing the certificates of participation, he has been served with a show cause notice dated 01.07.2019 by Respondent No.3 at the behest of Respondent No.2 stating that there is a discrepancy in his date of birth.

4. It is stated that the Petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) 6091/2022. The writ petition was dismissed vide Order dated 24.11.2022. The Petitioner challenged the Order dated 24.11.2022 by filing LPA 710/2022 and a Division Bench of this Court vide Order dated 12.12.2022 in LPA No.710/2022 directed that the case of the Petitioner should be placed before a Review Committee constituted for determination of age of the Petitioner and directed to decide the same afresh in light of the age verification report.

5. It is stated that only after the judgment passed by the Division Bench in LPA No.710/2022, certificates of participation were issued to the Petitioner. It is stated by the Petitioner that the he is being singled out and is being denied the permission to import a 0.22 and 0.32 sports pistol and has been denied permission to either import or in the alternative purchase it from Respondent No.2 despite the fact that he otherwise is eligible for the same. It is stated that the Petitioner is being unnecessarily harassed by Respondent No.2, therefore, the Petitioner has stood up to the illegal activities of Respondent No.2.

6. A reply has been filed on behalf of Respondent No.2/National Rifle Association of India. It is the stand of Respondent No.2 that the Petitioner has participated in 10M air pistol category but wants to import a firearm of 0.22 and 0.32 bore category which is not permissible. It is stated that if the Petitioner seeks to import a firearm of 0.22 or 0.32 bore, he must enrol himself for a National Shooting Championship Competition in 25M Standard Pistol Event or 25M Centre Fire Pistol Event and the Petitioner must obtain a Minimum Qualifying Score (MQS) of 530 in 0.22mm and MQS of 520 in 0.32 mm Shooting Event in order to be called as a renowned shooter which alone will entitle him to apply for a 0.22 or 0.32 bore for participation in games. It is stated that since the Petitioner is not a renowned shooter in the said events, he is ineligible to import a weapon of 0.22 and 0.32 bore which is a firearm under the Arms Act, 1959. It is further stated that the Petitioner has not participated in the requisite event in the year 2022 or 2023 and, therefore, the instant writ petition should be dismissed.

7. Heard the Petitioner, who appeared in person, and learned Counsel for the Respondents.

8. The Petitioner apart from making his submission that he is a renowned shooter has also handed over the copies of the receipt of Respondent No.2 that the Petitioner is a Member of Respondent No.2. The Petitioner also filed a certificate stating that he has participated in the UP State Rifle Association, Lucknow and that he has participated in the 62nd National Shooting Championship Competitions (NSCC) in Small Bore Rifle & Pistol Events which were held at Thiruvananthapuram from 15.11.2018

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top