SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1088

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J.
Sre Chena D. (Minor), Represented by Father and Next Friend Dhanapal A. - Petitioner
Versus
District Collector Palakkad, Collectorate, Palakkad & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 18322 of 2024
Decided On : 16-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rilgin V. George, K.T. Raveendran, P. Deepak (SR.).
For the Respondent: Sri. Sreejith V.S., Government Pleader, Sri. T.C. Krishna, SCGC.

IMPORTANT POINT
A minor can use firearms for training under the Arms Act but must hold a valid Arms Licence, regardless of exemptions for renowned shooters.

Headnote:

Arms - Arms Licence - Arms Act, 1959 Sections 3, 9, 41 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Arms Act, emphasizing the necessity of a licence for possession and use of firearms, even for minors under specific exemptions, ultimately allowing the petitioner's application for reconsideration.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a 16-year-old renowned shooter, applied for an Arms Licence to participate in competitions but was denied by the District Collector, citing age restrictions under the Arms Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, being a renowned shooter, was exempt from certain age restrictions but still required a licence to use firearms, as mandated by the Arms Act.

Issues: Whether the petitioner, a minor and renowned shooter, is entitled to an Arms Licence under the Arms Act despite age restrictions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while minors can use firearms for training under certain conditions, they must still hold a valid Arms Licence as per the Arms Act.

Result: The writ petition is allowed; the District Collector must reconsider the Arms Licence application within one month.

JUDGMENT :

N. Nagaresh, J.

The petitioner, who is aged 16 years, is a shooter registered with the National Rifle Association of India. The petitioner seeks to quash Ext.P6 and to command the 1st respondent-District Collector to forthwith reconsider Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner for Arms Licence.

2. The petitioner has participated in the 66th National Shooting Championship competitions (Pistol Events) held at Bhopal in the year 2023. The petitioner secured high score and was certified as 'Renowned Shooter'. The petitioner wanted to participate in point 22 Pistol matches at the State and National levels. The petitioner therefore applied for an Arms Licence under Section 3 of the Arms Act, 1959.

3. The petitioner states that the Central Government has issued Ext.P5 Notification dated 12.02.2020 exempting the class of persons specified therein from the operation of Section 9(1)(a)(i). The petitioner being a certified Renowned Shooter, she stands exempted from the provisions of Section 9(1)(a)(i). However, to the predicament of the petitioner, the 1st respondent-District Collector issued Ext.P6 order dated 03.05.2024 rejecting Ext.P3 application for Arms Licence submitted by the petitioner.

4. According to the 1st respondent, Section 9(2) of the Arms Act only enables a person who has attained the prescribed age limit, i.e., below the age of 21 years but not below the age of 12 years to use firearms under prescribed conditions in the course of training. It does not entitle such person to acquire, possess or carry firearms. The petitioner is not therefore entitled to Arms Licence.

5. The petitioner states that the 1st respondent has lost sight of the fact that in the light of Ext.P5 Notification issued under Section 41 of the Arms Act, 1959, the petitioner being a Renowned Shooter, stands exempted from the provisions of Section 9 of the Arms Act and Rule 36 of the Arms Rules. The petitioner would further submit that by Ext.P7 judgment, a learned Single Judge of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras has quashed an order of the Licensing Authority rejecting the application for Arms Licence submitted by the petitioner therein on the ground that he has not completed the age of 21 years. Ext.P6 order of the 1st respondent is therefore clearly illegal and unsustainable, contends the petitioner.

6. The 1st respondent-District Collector contested the writ petition filing counter affidavit. The 1st respondent submitted that the petitioner is 16 years old and is a minor. The petitioner has to undergo firearms and ammunition training as per the Arms Rules before an Accredited Trainer having licence to impart training as per Rule 39. At present, Government has not given accreditation to any trainer other than the Deputy Commandant of the Police Battalion. The petitioner has not produced S1 Firearms and Ammunition Safety Training Certificate as mandated in Rule 10 of the Arms Rules, 2016. The petitioner has only produced a certificate from an Accredited Shooter having licence under Rule 39. The writ petition is therefore without any merit and is liable to be dismissed.

7. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader representing the 1st respondent and the learned Senior Panel Counsel representing the 2nd respondent.

8. The petitioner is a shooter registered with the National Rifle Association of India (NRAI). The petitioner had taken part in the 66th National Shooting Championship Competitions (Pistol Events) held at Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh in the year 2023. The petitioner participated in the said championship as a competitor of the Kerala State Rifle Association. She has also participated in the 10M Air Pistol Sub Youth Women National Championship. As can be seen from Ext.P2 Certificate, the petitioner is a “Renowned Shooter”, in terms of Government of India Notification No.146/94-Cus dated 13.07.1994. Ext.P2 Certificate has been issued by the Secretary General of the National Rifle Association of India.

9

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          Judicial Analysis

          AI

          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top