SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 107

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Mohd. Yasin – Appellant
Versus
St. Stephens College – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. N.D. Pancholi, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. No. 61492/2023

1. The present application bearing under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/applicant seeking the following reliefs:

    "In view of above it is prayed that the above writ petition WP)C) 4839/2013 may kindly be revived. In terms of order dated 23.05.2023 (Annexure AA-I). It is prayed accordingly."

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/applicant submitted that the petitioner had raised an industrial dispute before the Industrial Tribunal, whereby, the Tribunal was tasked with deciding whether the act of the present respondent to ask the petitioner to vacate quarter no. 2, which he is in occupation of, is justified or not. The Industrial Tribunal had rejected the petitioner's case on 16th May, 2013 by holding that there was no industrial dispute between the parties and that the government was not competent to refer the dispute.

3. It is submitted that being aggrieved by the above mentioned award, the petitioner had filed the instant writ petition challenging the said award. Rule was issued by the Predecessor Bench of this Court on 25th September, 2014 and it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top