SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 230

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Nikhil Wadhawan – Appellant
Versus
Priti Wadhawan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manish Goswami, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. Shivam Bharara, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. - The present Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "HMA, 1955") has been filed on behalf of the appellant/husband against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.05.2009 whereby the divorce petition filed by the respondent/husband on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of HMA, 1955, has been dismissed.

2. Briefly stated that parties got married according to Hindu customs and rites on 14.10.1999 and one son was born from their wedlock on 28.12.2000.

3. The appellant/husband had asserted in his Divorce Petition that after the marriage, he and his family member gave due regard, respect, love and affection to the respondent/wife despite which she did not reciprocate the same sentiments towards him and his family members. Immediately after the marriage on 16.10.1999, the respondent started inquiring about the assets and business of the family of the appellant which caused a mental alarm in his mind. He assured her that he would take care of all the basic needs, but she remained adamant. It is further asserted that the respondent had asked for a partition and share in the business of the father of the appell

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top