SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 420

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Parvinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Shri Vipan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Indu Kaul, Advocate with Appellant in person.
Mr. Hari Krishan, Advocate with Respondent in person.

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. - The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed on behalf of the appellant/wife (respondent in the Divorce Petition) against the impugned Judgment dated 31.07.2018 of Principal Judge, Family Court, New Delhi granting divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion in a petition filed by the respondent/husband under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "HMA, 1955").

2. Briefly stated, the parties got married on 24.02.1995 according to Hindu rights and ceremonies against the wishes of their parents. Admittedly, the family of the respondent accepted their marriage, but the family of the appellant disillusioned by the marriage of the appellant against their wishes, disassociated themselves completely from the appellant and her in-laws. One son was born on 17.12.1995, from their marriage.

3. The respondent/husband had asserted in his Divorce Petition that the behavior and attitude of the appellant/wife was cordial for first few days of their marriage, but thereafter she turned hostile and would quarrel with the respondent on trivial issues. She refused to take interest i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top