Major Shashi Chauhan VS Major Ritu Bhasin

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Major Shashi Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Major Ritu Bhasin – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vikas Nagpal, Advocate with appellant in person
For the Respondent:Ms. Mishika Singh, Advocate from DHCLSC with respondent through Video Conferencing

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J.—Vindictiveness, vexation and intolerance are the foes of coherent comprehension. Though the aggrieved person is entitled and well within their rights to avail the remedy under laws, but, crossing the point of “no return” becomes inevitable once the spouses get engulfed in this rabbit hole of criminal litigations. The bullets of unjustified accusations and complaints cause such fatal wounds, leading to unendurable mental and physical acrimony, making it impossible for the spouses to live together.

CM APPL. 30029/2019

1. By way of present application, the applicant/appellant seeks condonation of 45 days’ delay in re-filing the present Appeal.

2. For the reasons and grounds stated in the present application, the application is allowed, the delay of 45 days in re-filing the present Appeal is condoned.

3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 172/2019

4. The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed on behalf of the appellant/husband assailing the Judgment and Decree dated 21.12.2018 vide which the Divorce Petition filed by the appellant/husband under Section 13 (1)(ia) of the Hindu Marri