ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Yashaswini Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Tapodhani Aluminium Trading Co. Through Sh. Narender Kumar Jain – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.
CRL.M.C. 1176/2021, CRL.M.C. 1187/2021, CRL.M.C. 1207/2021, CRL.M.C. 1208/2021 and CRL.M.C. 2289/2021
1. Five separate petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') have been preferred on behalf of the petitioner, who was impleaded as accused No.3 in the complaint cases preferred under Section 138/141 NI Act by the respondent; for quashing of proceedings emanating from Complaint Case No.9996/2014; 9995/2014; 9994/2014; 9997/2014 and 9993/2014, pending before learned MM (NI Act), North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
2. In brief, complaints under Sections 138/141 NI Act were filed on behalf of the respondent against M/s Genesis Industrial Solution Pvt. Ltd. (accused No.1 Company) alongwith accused Nos.2 to 4 being the Directors, before the learned Trial Court. The averments made in para 2 of the complaint may be reproduced for the purpose of present proceedings:
"2. That the accused No.1 is a private limited company and is engaged in the business of trading of Aluminum at the abovesaid address. The accused No.2 to 4 are the directors of the accused No.1 and accused No.2 is authorised signatory of accused No.1 and has been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.