SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sachin Datta, J.
Sakshi - Appellant
Versus
Jawaharlal Nehru University Through Its Registrar & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3735 of 2024 and CM Appls. 15399 of 2024, 15401 of 2024
Decided On : 15-03-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Mr. Aditya Kashyap, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Siddhant Poddar, Advs., for the Petitioner.
Ms. Monika Arora along with Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Advs. for R1.
Mr. Vasanth Rajasekaran, Mr. Saurabh Babulkar and Mr. Harshvardhan Korada, Advs. Mr. Abhik Chimin, Mr. Anant Khajuria, Mr. Maroof, Advs. for Intervenors.

IMPORTANT POINT
The importance of addressing grievances through the Grievance Redressal Cell and the appointment of an observer to ensure oversight of the election process.

Headnote:

Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC - Constitution of Election Committee - Article 13, Article 18 of the Constitution of the JNUSU - [Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC, Article 13, Article 18]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the procedure for constituting the Election Committee for the JNUSU elections. The petitioner argued that the procedure bypassed the Students Council and was conducted in complete contravention of the rules, vitiating the election process. The respondents contended that there was no infirmity in the exercise and that the elections were conducted in accordance with the timeline and procedures.

Finding of the Court:

The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding the constitution of the Election Committee and directed the petitioner to approach the Grievance Redressal Cell. The court also appointed an observer to oversee the ongoing election process.

Issues: Constitution of Election Committee, Bypassing of Students Council, Allegations of Arbitrary Conduct

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to address the petitioner's grievances through the Grievance Redressal Cell and appointed an observer to oversee the election process.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with directions for the petitioner to approach the Grievance Redressal Cell and the appointment of an observer to oversee the election process.

JUDGMENT

Sachin Datta, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.16323/2024 (filed under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC for intervention and directions)

1. This is an application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC seeking intervention/impleadment of (i) Aishe Ghosh and (ii) Md. Danish.

2. With the consent of the parties, the application is allowed. Consequently, the applicants i.e. Aishe Ghosh and Md. Danish are impleaded as respondent nos.3 and 4 respectively.

W.P.(C) 3735/2024

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved with the procedure adopted by the respondents for constituting the Election Committee (`EC') for the purpose of elections of the Students Council and office bearers of the Jawaharlal Nehru University Students Union (`JNUSU') for the academic year 2023-24 [hereinafter referred to as the impugned elections]. In this context, the petitioner has impugned the notification dated 16.02.2024 whereby it was recorded that the respondent nos.3 and 4 have been authorised by the University General Body Meeting (`UGBM') to conduct the General Body Meeting (`GBM') in the various constituent schools of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) for electing the members of the `election committee' for the purpose of the impugned elections.

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid nomination/authorization by the UGBM in favour of the respondent nos.3 and 4, the said respondents organized/presided over General Body Meetings in the various constituent schools of JNU.

5. Consequentially, in furtherance of the aforesaid exercise, a further notification dated 06.03.2024 came to be issued by the respondent nos.3 and 4 whereby the names of the members of the EC along with chairperson was notified. The said notice reads as under :-

6. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has made the following submissions :-

(i) It is contended that in terms of article 13 of the Constitution of the JNUSU, the elections to elect the Students' council and office bearers of the JNUSU are required to be held "not later than three months from the date of the opening of the University after the summer vacation." It is submitted that is thus, an embargo on conducting elections after the expiry of the said period. It is submitted that rationale of this stipulation is to ensure that elections are not conducted at a time when majority of the students are occupied with examinations and academic deadlines, making it non conducive for them to participate in the election process.

(ii) Attention is drawn to Article 18 of the Constitution of the JNUSU, which provides as under :-

    "Article 18. Election Committee

    (i) There shall be Election Committee consisting of as many full-time students from each school as needed but not exceeding as many persons as there are councillors from each school to conduct elections of the office-bearers and the councillors.

    (ii) Rules and procedures of Student Union Elections are laid down in Appendix 1.

    (iii) Every member of this Committee must have the approval of 2/3 of the students council and this panel must be presented by the student council to the General Bodies of each school for approval of the respective members from each school.

    (iv) No member of the Students Council is eligible for the membership of this committee."

It is contended that in terms of the aforesaid stipulation, for the purpose of constituting the election committee, the election committee must have approval of 2/3rd of the Students Council and thereafter, the panel must be presented to the general body for approval of respective members from each school. It is submitted that the procedure adopted for the purpose of constituting the election committee for the impugned elections completely by-passes the Students Council. It is contended that whilst excluding the Students Council, the respondent no.3 and 4 were handpicked for the purpose of conducting the GBM of the various constituent schools of the JNU, for the purpose of electing members of the EC. According to the learned senior counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top