SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 602

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Snehlata Devi (As Guardian of Mishti) - Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 4079 of 2024 & CM APPL. 16681 of 2024
Decided On : 18-03-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ishan Sanghi, Ms. Sagrika and Ms. Poorwashi Kalra, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocate for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (Civil) for DoE.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court's intervention aimed to ensure the accommodation of the petitioner's daughter in an appropriate school, considering her entitlement to admission as a DG category student.

Headnote:

OBC - Preferential Admission - The court addressed the petitioner's claim to belong to the other backward classes (OBC) and seek preferential admission as a Disadvantaged Group (DG) category student. The petitioner's daughter was found entitled to admission, but the school did not grant her admission, leading to the court's intervention.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, claiming to belong to OBC, sought preferential admission for her daughter as a DG category student. The Directorate of Education found the petitioner's daughter entitled to admission, but the school did not grant her admission.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the DoE to consider accommodating the petitioner's daughter in an appropriate school in Class I.

Issues: The issue revolved around the petitioner's claim for preferential admission for her daughter as a DG category student and the school's refusal to grant admission.

Ratio Decidendi: The court intervened to ensure that the petitioner's daughter could be accommodated in an appropriate school in Class I, considering her entitlement to admission as a DG category student.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the DoE to consider accommodating the petitioner's daughter in an appropriate school in Class I.

ORDER (Oral)

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, who claims to belong to other backward classes (OBC), and, therefore, seeks preferential admission as a Disadvantaged Group (DG) category student. She applied for admission as a DG category student to the Directorate of Education (DoE) which, consequent to a computerised draw of lots, found the petitioner's daughter entitled to be admitted to the KG/Pre-school class for the academic year 2022-23.

2. Allegedly because the school did not grant her admission, the petitioner has approached this Court.

3. However, after 2022-23, the 2023-24 academic session is also over.

4. Mr. Ishan Sanghi, therefore, submits, quite clearly, that he would be satisfied if this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the DoE to consider whether the petitioner's daughter Mishti can be allotted an appropriate school in Class I.

5. Mr. Utkarsh Singh who appears for the DoE submits that the DoE would take all possible efforts to accommodate the petitioner's daughter in an appropriate school in Class I.

6. This writ petition is, therefore, disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top