SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5039

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J.
Deeksha & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 13143 of 2021 & CM Appl. 16006 of 2022
Decided On : 31-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Mr. Siddham Nahata, Ms. Bhumika Sharma and Mr. Auritro Mukherjee, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, SC(Civil) GNCTD with Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Mr. Arun Panwar, Mr. Kartik Sharma and Ms. Mahak Rankawat, Advocates, DOE.
Mr. Shivam Malhotra, Advocate, for R-4 school.
Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Ms. Aakriti Garg, Advocates, for R- 16

The main legal principle established is the obligation of the Directorate of Education to consider allotting schools for admission of children under the EWS/DG category in different classes based on age.

Headnote:

EWS/DG Category - Admission of Children - The court directed the Directorate of Education to consider allotting schools to petitioners for admission in different classes under the Freeship category.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petition was filed for admission of 35 children to various classes in different schools under the EWS/DG category. The petition survived only with respect to 6 petitioners.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition with directions to consider allotting schools to the petitioners for admission in different classes under the Freeship category.

Issues: Admission of children under the EWS/DG category, refusal of admission, and seeking admission in different classes based on age.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the age of the petitioners and directed the Directorate of Education to allot schools for admission in different classes under the Freeship category.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with directions to the Directorate of Education for the admission of the petitioners in different classes under the Freeship category.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition had initially been filed for admission of 35 children to various classes in different schools under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS)/Disadvantaged Group (DG) category.

2. As per the submissions made on behalf of the ld. counsel for the petitioners, as of now, the petition survives only with respect to 6 petitioners viz. Petitioner Nos.5, 18, 22, 23, 24 and 27.

3. I have heard ld. counsels for the parties.

4. Considering the submissions made before this Court, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

    I. Petitioner No.5 was initially allotted seat for admission in Class - 1, which was refused by respondent No.4 school, on the ground that the entry level class was Class Nursery in respondent No.4 school. The Date of Birth of petitioner No.5 is 29.07.2015 and as per the current age of the said petitioner, the petitioner is now seeking admission in Class - 2. In view thereof, directions are issued to the Directorate of Education (DOE) to consider allotting school to the petitioner for admission in Class - 2 under the Freeship category in a school in the neighbourhood of the petitioner No.5.

    II. It is submitted that the petitioner No. 18 has already been granted admission in the Kendriya Vidyalaya School. Thus, the said petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter any further. Thus, no directions are required to be passed qua petitioner No.18.

    III. Petitioner No.22 concerns the case of two children viz. Gunjan and Lavesh. It is submitted that Lavesh has already been granted admission under the EWS/DG category to respondent No.13 school. Thus, ld. Counsel for petitioners seeks admission for Gunjan in Class -2. The Date of Birth of petitioner No.22, Gunjan is 02.11.2015. Thus, the DOE is directed to consider the case of petitioner No.22, for admission in Class - 2 under the Freeship category in a school in the neighbourhood of the said petitioner.

    IV. Petitioner No.23 was allotted respondent No.14 school by the DOE for admission under the EWS/DG category in Class - 1. However, the admission was denied to the said petitioner. The Date of Birth of petitioner No.23 is 23.06.2016. Thus, as per the current age of petitioner No.23, admission is now sought in Class - 2. In view thereof, directions are issued to the DOE to consider allotment of a school to petitioner No.23 for admission in Class - 2 under the Freeship category in a school in the neighbourhood of the said petitioner.

    V. It is submitted on behalf of ld. Counsel for petitioners that petitioner No.24 has already been granted admission in Kendriya Vidyalaya School. Thus, he does not wish to pursue the matter any further. Therefore, no directions are required to be issued with respect to petitioner No.24.

    VI. Petitioner No.27 was initially allotted respondent No.15 school for admission in Class - 1 in the academic session 2021-2022. However, the said petitioner was kept in waiting list by the respondent No.15 school in the said session as well as in the next academic session 2022- 2023. Thus, admission for petitioner No.27 is now sought in Class - 3. The Date of Birth of petitioner No.27 is 14.11.2015. Thus, DOE is directed to allot a school to petitioner No.27 for admission in Class - 3 under the Freeship category in a school in the vicinity of the petitioner No.27.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition is disposed of along with all the pending applications.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top