Back
JYOTI SINGH
Shalimar Paints Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Marble & Sanitary Store & Anr – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of parties and transaction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of trial and initial proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. grounds for trial court's acquittal. (Para 5) |
| 4. appellant's claims against trial court decision. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's detailed analysis and relevant statutory provisions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. key legal principles regarding vicarious liability. (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. court's findings and dismissal of appeal. (Para 14 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. final judgment and order. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral) - Present appeal has been filed by the Appellant under Section 378 Cr.P.C. assailing order dated 22.11.2013 passed by learned MM (South)-01, NI Act, Saket Courts, Delhi in CC No. 550/1 titled `M/s Shalimar Paints Ltd. v. M/s National Marble & Sanitary Store'. Appellant/M/s. Shalimar Paints Ltd. was the Complainant before the Trial Court while Respondent No.1/M/s. National Marble & Sanitary Store was the accused. Respondent No.2 herein/M/s. National Marble & Sanitary Store VV was not arrayed as a party before the Trial Court. For the sake of convenience Complainant is referred to as the Appellant while accused is referred to as the Respondent hereinafte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
