SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 666

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
State NCT of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Pargun & Anr – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP, for the State.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 7818/2024 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.A. 7819/2024 (D/R/52 days)

3. By way of present application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 52 days in re-filing the petition.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 52 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.

5. Application is disposed of.

CRL.REV.P. 344/2024 & CRL.M.A. 7817/2024 (D/568 days)

6. By way of CRL.M.A. 7817/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 568 days in filing the petition.

7. The ground urged in the application is that the certified copy of the impugned order dated 08.10.2021 was received on 22.10.2021 and further that the approval was granted by the Director of Prosecution on 26.11.2021.

8. The application is bereft of any cogent reasons explaining the delay and is liable be dismissed.

9. Irrespective of the same, the Court proceeds to examine the petition on merits as well.

10. The present revision petition has been filed under Section 397 and 401 read with Sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top