SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Arnesh Shaw – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. need for affordable treatment for rare diseases. (Para 2 , 5 , 18)
2. establishment and management of a rare diseases fund. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11)
3. indigenous development critical for rare disease treatment. (Para 15 , 19)
4. commencement of treatment as per court orders. (Para 21 , 22 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present batch of petitions have been filed by the Petitioners who are mostly children suffering from Rare Diseases. The case of the Petitioners is that the medicines and therapies for the said Rare Diseases are exorbitantly expensive, and directions ought to be issued to the Respondents i.e., the Union of India and its Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, All India Institute of Medical Science (hereinafter, "AIIMS"), as well as, the GNCTD, to provide continuous and uninterrupted treatment to the Petitioners, free of cost.

3. These matters have been heard by the Court from time to time and various directions have been issued for enabling treatment and for making available medicines for the Petitioners.

4. Vide previous order dated 29th November, 2022, the Department of B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top