NAVIN CHAWLA
Rahul Darbari – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Khobragade – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These petitions have been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, `Cr.P.C.'), challenging the Order dated 18.02.2022 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-03 (NI Act), New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the `Trial Court') in the complaints filed by the petitioner herein under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the `NI Act'), being Complaint Case no.54783/2016 (in CRL M.C. 1171/2022) and Complaint Case no.53009/2016 (in CRL M.C. 1172/2022), both titled Rahul Darbari v. Arun Kumar Khobragade & Ors., dismissing the application filed by the petitioner/complainant under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. for recalling himself as a witness.
Factual Matrix:
2. The above complaints were filed by the petitioner on 26.09.2015.
3. The respondents filed petitions under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., one of them being Crl.M.C. No. 2496/2016, seeking quashing of the said complaints.
4. The petitioner herein, as a respondent in the above petition, filed his counter affidavit, and the respondents, as petitioners in those petitions, filed their rejoinders.
5. The said peti
Ajay Kumar Choudhary v. Union of India
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra
Dr. Krishna Paul v. State of UP
Manju Devi v. State of Rajasthan
P. Mohanraj v. Shah Bros. Ispat (P) Ltd.
Iddar and Ors v. Aabida and Anr.
Rajaram Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v. Central Bureau of Investigation
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Shiv Kumar Yadav
Umar Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan
U.T. of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Anr v. Fatehsinh Mohansinh Chauhan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.