Back
DHARMESH SHARMA
Ramesh Lakhwani (Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives – Appellant
Versus
Shri Manish Kumar Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Dharmesh Sharma, J.)
1. The petitioners are seeking initiation of the contempt proceedings against the respondent for the alleged wilful disobedience of the directions passed by this Court contained in the order dated 18.03.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No.3359/2017 titled “Ramesh Lakhwani vs. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.”
2. In a nutshell, the said writ petition came to be filed by the original petitioner, namely Shri Ramesh Lakhwani, who expired on 11.05.2017 leaving behind the present petitioners who happen to be his Class-I legal heirs, comprising of his widow and two children, i.e., a son and a daughter.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the brief facts reveal that a plot bearing No. J-221, Malviya Nagar Extension, Saket, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “subject plot”), was initially allotted to one Shri Ranjit Singh under the ‘South Delhi Residential Scheme’ by the respondent/DDA, and a perpetual lease deed was executed in his favour on 20.10.1980. Thereafter, the original Petitioner, Shri Ramesh Lakhwani, acquired leasehold rights upon the subject plot through a registered Agreement to Sell dated 13.01.1980 executed by the original allottee i.e., Shri Ranjit
The court emphasized that compliance with its orders is mandatory, and failure to do so constitutes contempt, regardless of subsequent legal challenges.
The failure of the DDA to process the property conversion request due to unsubstantiated claims of fraud and lack of documentation violates the respondent's rights.
Point of Law : If such wilful disobedience is made out, it is duty of Court to take cognizance of same as contempt - Conduct of Contemnor must be of such nature which undermines dignity of Court and ....
Misuse charges levied by authority are unsustainable when not timely addressed, and delay in processing applications cannot be penalized against the petitioner.
when the contemnor deliberately and willfully violated the order of the Court, he is liable for consequences under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, but the Court cannot be hyper sensitive in....
Order on the basis of which the contempt case is filed does not depict that any straight direction was given to the respondents to delete the subject land from the prohibited list of the properties u....
Contempt of Court arises when a party fails to comply with court orders, violating the principles of natural justice and due process.
Contempt proceedings must meet stringent standards; ambiguity in court orders can prevent a finding of contempt without clear and definitive directions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
