SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 807

AMIT BANSAL
PRAKASH PIPES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
JAI AMBAY INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Rishabh Srivastava, Sahil Gupta, Yasheswini Sharma

JUDGMENT :

AMIT BANSAL, J.

1. The present rectification petition has been filed under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter, ‘the Act’) seeking removal of the trademark ‘KIRANPARKASH’ bearing trademark registration No. 3587350 in Class 17, from the Register of Trade Marks.

PROCEEDINGS IN THE PETITION

2. Notice in the present petition was issued by the erstwhile Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) on 5th March, 2020. Despite service, the respondent no. 1 failed to appear before the IPAB. Thereafter, the present petition was received on transfer after the abolition of the IPAB pursuant to the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021.

3. Court notice was issued to the respondent no. 1 by this Court on 6th July, 2022. Counsel for the respondent no. 1 entered appearance on 9th November, 2022 and four weeks’ time was granted to file reply. However, the counsel for the respondent no. 1 did not appear on the next date of hearing, i.e. 15th March, 2023. Accordingly, a default notice was issued to the respondent no. 1.

4. It was noted in the order dated 17th July, 2023 that the respondent no. 1 has refused service of the default notice and consequently, the respondent no. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top