Back
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Director General CISF – Respondent
ORDER :
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 31.05.2012 passed by the Senior Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force (in short “CISF”), terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground that he had concealed, in his attestation form and in the questionnaire form, that he had been prosecuted in Case No. 81/06 under Sections 341, 323, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which had been registered and for which a Charge Sheet No. 67/06, dated 19.07.2006 had been framed at Bagad Police Station, Rajasthan against him.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the FIR, that has been referred to by the respondents in the Impugned Order, had been registered on an incident arising out of an altercation between his family members which took place sometime in 2006. When the charge sheet was filed, the family members entered into a settlement and on the first date itself, that is 14.08.2006, the case was closed and the charges were dropped against the petitioner. Five years from that incident, the petitioner applied for recruitment in the CISF in the year 2011. He was in a state of confusion whether the case, though had been clos
Non-disclosure of a past minor criminal case does not automatically justify termination of employment; each case must be evaluated on its specific facts and circumstances.
Non-disclosure of a pending criminal case in employment applications must be evaluated against the nature of the charges and the context of acquittal, impacting the candidate's suitability for servic....
Non-disclosure of minor criminal involvement does not automatically disqualify a candidate; suitability must be assessed holistically by the appointing authority.
Suppression of material facts regarding pending criminal cases has a clear bearing on the character, conduct, and antecedents of the employee, and can lead to termination of services.
A candidate's non-disclosure of a past acquitted criminal case does not automatically justify disqualification from public service; each case must be assessed on its merits and surrounding context.
Termination – Even where there was a subsequent acquittal, an employee cannot claim appointment as a matter of right having furnished false information or having indulged in suppression of material f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
