SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 914

MANMOHAN, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Jamia Arabia Nizamia Welfare Education Society – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice Chairman – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rakesh Lakra, Mr. Bhavya Sharma, Ms. Kanika Sharma and Ms. Shivani Kher, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate and Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Prateek Dhir, Mr. Shivani Takiar, Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Mr. Govind Kumar, Ms. Chand Chopra and Ms. Neha Bhupathiraju, Mr. Pavan Narang, SPC with Mr. Himanshu Sethi and Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra, Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, with Mr. Monis Raridi, Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, SPP with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Abhinav Bhardwaj and Mr. Ravinder Kumar Bharti, Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, S.I. Aman Kumar, P.S. H. N. Din., Mr. M. Arshyan, Proxy Counsel for applicant Mr. Babu Ali.

JUDGMENT :

MANMOHAN, C.J.

1. Present Public Interest Litigation had been filed seeking action against officials of the respondents who had allowed the encroachers to carry out unauthorized/illegal construction at Khasra no. 556, Ziyrat Guest House, near Baoli Gate, Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah, near Police Booth. The petitioner had also sought a direction to demolish the said illegal and unauthorized construction.

2. When the matter was listed for the first time on 16th January, 2024, this Court was informed that despite the petitioner’s representation dated 3rd November, 2023 to the respondents highlighting the illegal construction being carried out at Ziyrat Guest House and the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) issuing a Work Stop Notice dated 11th December, 2023, the statutory authorities had failed to take any action. Since learned counsel for ASI had stated that it had written a letter dated 2nd January, 2024 to the SHO, Nizamuddin (West) to register an FIR, this Court had observed that, prima facie, illegal and unauthorized construction was taking place with the tacit support, if not active connivance of statutory authorities and hence directed the respondents to ensure that no f

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top