SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DEVINDER GUPTA, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
Manohar Lal Arya – Appellant
Versus
Lal Bahadur Shastri – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.S.A. Siddioui, J. The petitioners, unsuccessful applicants for the post of Registrar in the office of the Respondent No. 1, by this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, are challenging the selection of respondent No. 2 to the said post. The petitioners have also filed Writ Petition No. 114/1996 under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing the letter dated 22.12.1995 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development (Department of Education), approving the retention of lien of respondent no. 2 in Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan to enable him to join the post of Registrar in the office of the respondent No. 1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Writ Petition 114/1996 as both the petitions raise common questions of facts and law.

2. It is beyond the pale of controversy that the petitioners are lecturers of the Lal Bahadur Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidayapeeth (hereinafter referred to as 'Vidyapeeth'), which is a deemed University under the University Grants Commission. The petitioners are drawing the pay scale of Reader. Respondent No. 2 is a permanent employee holding the post of a senior Lecturer in the Kendriya Sanskrit Vidy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top