SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MAHMOOD ALI KHAN
Hans Raj – Appellant
Versus
Amrik Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mahmood Ali Khan, J.

ADMIT.

1. Parties have requested for disposal of this petition on the basis of arguments addressed by them.

2. This civil revision is directed against an order of a Civil Judge dated 23.3.2001 by which he has dismissed an application of the petitioner/judgment debtor filed under Section 152 read with Section 151 CPC.

3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the respondents filed a civil suit for recovery of Rs. 3,678.24 from the petitioner as arrears of rent etc., for the period from 1.1.1992 to 31.11.1994 @ Rs. 90.75 per month and from 1.12.1994 @99.82 per month excluding electricity, water and other charges. The break up of the amount claimed was given in paragraph 7 of the plaint and showed a sum of Rs. 2,722.50 having been recovered from the petitioner for the period from 1.1.1992 to 30.6.1996.

4. The petitioner contested the suit. He, inter alia, pleaded that he had paid a sum of Rs. 2640/- @ Rs. 82.50 per month for the period from January 1992 to February 1995 by cheques drawn in favor of respondent No. 1. Thereafter, he remitted Rs. 2130/- @ Rs. 100/- per month by money order. As such he has paid rent up to June 1996. He denied liabilit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top