SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Swatantra Arora – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Kumar Bali – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

1. On 31st July, 2018, when this petition came up first before this Court, the following order was passed:

    "3. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 1st March, 2018 in CC No.23/2017 of the Court of Judge, Family Court, East District] of dismissal of the application under Order VII Rule11 of the CPC filed by the petitioner wife for rejection of a Petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the respondent husband for restitution of conjugal rights.

    4. Rejection of the petition for restitution of the conjugal rights was sought on the ground that the respondent husband who was living in USA had obtained a judgment from the US Court of dissolution of marriage with the petitioner wife. However only a photocopy of the said judgment was placed on record of the Family Court.

    5. The application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC filed by the petitioner wife has been dismissed reasoning (i) that the petitioner wife had been unable to produce an authenticated/certified copy of the judgment and decree of the foreign court; (ii) that rejection under Order VII Rule 11

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top