SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Irfan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

Crl.M.A.2235/2019 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Crl.M.A.2234/2019 (for condonation of delay)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner was incarcerated, the petition was filed through jail, on account of which, the delay took place. He further submits that the petitioner did not have resources to appoint a private counsel and petition has been filed through legal aid.

2. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of the averments in the application, she does not oppose condonation of delay.

3. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the petition is condoned.

CRL.REV.P. 127/2019 & Crl.M.(Bail) 199/2019 (for suspension of sentence)

4. Petitioner impugns judgment dated 15.09.2018, whereby, appeal of the petitioner, impugning judgment on sentence dated 28.07.2015 and order on sentence dated 30.07.2015, has been dismissed.

5. Petitioner has been convicted of an offence under Section 382 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo 4 years rigorous imprisonment and also convicted of an offence under Section 25(1-B)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top