JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J.(Oral)--The present petition assails the order dated 27.10.2016 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (`Tribunal') in OA No.3809/2013. Vide the impugned order, the Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioner, wherein she had assailed Note II in para 10(D) of the advertisement issued for the recruitment of Sub-Inspectors in Delhi Police & Central Armed Police Forces, Assistant Sub-Inspectors in Central Industrial Security Force, and Intelligence Officers in Narcotics Control Bureau (`Recruitment Advertisement, 2013'), as bad in law. The petitioner also prayed for a direction to the respondents to treat her candidature as valid for the examinations held in pursuance of the Recruitment Advertisement 2013, and to process her application by declaring her result for Paper II and, in case she meets the cut off marks and is placed in the merit list, she be appointed to the post of Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police, after allowing her an opportunity to qualify in the Physical Examination Test and Medical Test.

2. The impugned Note II contained in para 10(D) of the Recruitment Advertisement, 2013 (