Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Medirad Tech India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Technology Development Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') challenging the Arbitral Award dated 25.06.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Loan Agreement dated 30.08.2000 and the Supplementary Agreement dated 05.05.2005 executed between the parties.
2. The respondent/Technology Development Board has been constituted by the Government of India under the provisions of the Technology Development Board Act, 1995 for assisting and disbursing loan to the Companies/Organizations engaged in development and commercialization of indigenous technology and adaptation of imported technologies for wider domestic applications.
3. By the Loan Agreement dated 30.08.2000 the respondent granted a loan assistance of Rs.850 lakhs against the project cost of Rs.1750.11 lakhs under Phase-I and Rs.525 lakhs against the project cost of Rs.1049.45 lakhs under Phase-II to the petitioner for implementing the two phases of the Project of Development and Commercialization of Technology in Radiation Therapy and Allied Science
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
