Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, BRIJESH SETHI
State – Appellant
Versus
Shambhu Dayal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Brijesh Sethi, J. The appellant has instituted the present appeal under section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as `Cr.P.C.') against the impugned judgment and order dated 15.10.1999, in Sessions Case No. 14/98, arising out of FIR No.143/1987, registered at Police Station-Anand Parbat; whereby the Trial Court has acquitted the accused persons Shambhu Dayal, Prakash Chand and Sh. Lal Singh (hereinafter referred to as `the respondents') of a charge framed against all of them under section 452/304/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and u/s. 342 IPC against accused Lal Singh.
2. The case of the prosecution as elaborated by the learned Trial Court is as follows:
"2. Prosecution case, as disclosed in charge-sheet, is that on 23.11.87, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, the complainant, gave statement to Shri Harmeet Singh, ACP, Patel Nagar at RML Hospital in the presence of Shri Kartar Singh that she was residing at 408/5AC, Anand Parbat with her children. The house was taken on rent from Ranjit Singh. The sons of Puran Singh were asking her to vacate the house since long saying that they had purchased the house. For this she had obtained a stay from the Cou
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
