SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
G.S.SISTANI, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Ritu Bharga – Appellant
Versus
Sharad Bhargava – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J.

CM No. 35332/2018 (Delay)

The present application has been filed by the appellant for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 78 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.

The application stands disposed of.

C.M. 35330/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C) 221/2018 & C.M. 35331/2018 (stay)

1. In the present appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the appellant/wife is aggrieved by an order dated 19.03.2018 (hereinafter the 'Impugned Order') passed by the Family Court, whereby the application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955(hereinafter referred to as `HMA') in the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of HMA was dismissed.

2. The brief background leading to the filing of the present appeal is that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 17.11.2009 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. No issue was born out of the wedlock. A petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the HMA was filed by the respondent, s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top