Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to macp benefit and arrears (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. previous court decision referenced (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. notice issued; slp pending confirmation (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 4. directives for implementing macp benefits (Para 8) |
| 5. order to abide by supreme court's rulings (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M. No. 28865/2020
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.8949/2020
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 2 to 5 to give the benefit of the 2nd MACP to the Petitioner No.1 to 6 in the pay scale of Sub Inspector @ Rs.9300-34800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- upon completion of 20 years of regular service with the CRPF, from their respective due dates of year 2005 by treating the MACP as applicable since 1st January 2006 onwards.
2. Petitioners further pray for a direction to the respondents to pay the arrears in the above terms after rectification of their pay scale along with consequential arrears arising therefrom.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by th
Employees are entitled to 2nd MACP benefits after 20 years of service, with decisions referencing prior cases upheld, ensuring timely payment of benefits and adherence to established judicial precede....
The court affirmed that entitled benefits under the MACP scheme should be granted retroactively from the completion of service, emphasizing adherence to prior judgments and liable interest for delaye....
The court ruled that the petitioner is entitled to the benefits of the 2nd MACP scheme, impacted from a specific date, following an authoritative precedent.
The court directed the application of the 2nd MACP from 01st January 2006 based on precedents, ensuring correct pay scale alignment for the petitioner after 20 years of service.
Prior judgments govern subsequent related claims, mandating adherence to previous decisions regarding entitlements under the MACP scheme.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioners to the benefit of the 2nd MACP scheme from the date of completion of 20 years of service, as well as the obligat....
The Court directed timely resolution of benefits claims, highlighting the importance of correct rank hierarchy in service law.
The court's decision was influenced by a previous decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the same issue.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
