SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Jagdish Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 10270 of 2020
Decided On : 11-01-2021




The court directed the application of the 2nd MACP from 01st January 2006 based on precedents, ensuring correct pay scale alignment for the petitioner after 20 years of service.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petition - 2nd Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme - Claim for pay scale adjustment and arrears - Benefit of 2nd MACP to be granted from the date of 20 years of service as recognized by prior court decision dated 13th September 2019, which addressed similar issues concerning pay scales. (Paras 1, 7-8)

(B) Jurisdiction - Court recognizes that pending special leave petitions do not affect the enforceability of its decision. (Para 9)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed seeking the implementation of MACP after 20 years of service. The petitioner claimed incorrect application of MACP benefits by the respondents.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the benefit of MACP to be applied from 01st January 2006, acknowledging prior decisions in similar cases.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the applicability of MACP benefits based on prior court rulings and the proper pay scale recognition for the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court found that established precedents dictate the terms under which MACP benefits should be awarded, reinforcing the binding nature of its previous rulings on the matter.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for macp benefits after 20 years of service. (Para 1)
2. previous court ruling impacts current petition. (Para 2 , 3 , 6)
3. court's acknowledgement of prior decisions guiding current case. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
4. court's directive for macp benefits adjustment and payment. (Para 8)
5. order dependent on supreme court's rulings and notification of order. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.32518/2020

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.10270/2020

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to give the benefit of 2nd Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) to the Petitioner in the pay scale of Sub Inspector @ Rs.9300-34,800/- with Grade pay of Rs.4200/- from 15th April 2006 upon completion of 20 years of regular service with CRPF by treating the MACP as applicable since 01st January, 2006 onwards; and to revise the pay of the Petitioner in above said terms and give the arrears to the Petitioner after rectification/revision of his pays scale along with subsequent benefits arising therefrom.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by this Court in W.P.(C) 8203/2019 Ex. HC/GH Prahalad Vs. Union of India and Ors. vide order dated 13th September, 2019 as modified by order dated 18th September, 2019.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the Respondents have given the benefit of the 2nd MACP in an incorrect manner i.e. pay band of Assistant Sub-Inspector post @ 5200-20200/- + Grade pay Rs.2800 since 01st September, 2008, (i.e. when the MACP scheme came into force).

4. Issue notice.

5. Ms.Sunieta Ojha, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. She states that a number of special leave petitions are pending consideration before the Supreme Court on the same issue.

6. In rejoinder, learned counsel for the petitioners states that no SLP is pending against the judgment and order in Ex. HC/GD Prahalad (supra), W.P.(C) No.8203/2019 before the Apex Court.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the prayer in the present petition stands covered by the decision dated 13th September, 2019, as modified by order dated 18th September, 2019, of this Court in W.P.(C) 8203/2019 (Ex.HC/GD Prahalad v. Union of India and batch).

8. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed with the following directions:

(i) The benefit of the 2nd MACP will be given from the date of completion of 20 years of service by treating the MACP scheme as applicable with effect from 01st January 2006 onwards;

(ii) The petitioners will be placed in the appropriate pay scale of SI/HC etc. as the case may be (for eg. In the case of SIs Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of 4200) from the date of completion of 20 years of regular service;

(iii) The appropriate orders will be issued and the arrears will be paid to the petitioners within a period of 12 weeks, failing which the respondents would be liable to simple interest at 6% per annum on the arrears for the period of delay.

9. Needless to state that the present order will abide by the judgment and order to be passed by the Supreme Court in the pending SLPs, if any, on the similar issue.

10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top