SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Jagdish Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for macp benefits after 20 years of service. (Para 1)
2. previous court ruling impacts current petition. (Para 2 , 3 , 6)
3. court's acknowledgement of prior decisions guiding current case. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
4. court's directive for macp benefits adjustment and payment. (Para 8)
5. order dependent on supreme court's rulings and notification of order. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.32518/2020

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.10270/2020

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to give the benefit of 2nd Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) to the Petitioner in the pay scale of Sub Inspector @ Rs.9300-34,800/- with Grade pay of Rs.4200/- from 15th April 2006 upon completion of 20 years of regular service with CRPF by treating the MACP as applicable since 01st January, 2006 onwards; and to revise the pay of the Petitioner in above said terms and give the arrears to the Petitioner after rectification/revision of his pays scale along with subsequent benefits arising therefrom.

2. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top