SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Paypal Payments Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Financial Intelligence Unit India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. impugned order and penalties under pml act (Para 3)
2. petitioner's arguments against reporting entity status (Para 4 , 5)
3. preliminary objections raised by the respondent (Para 6 , 8)
4. need for regulatory clarity on payment system classification (Para 9 , 11)
5. court directions and stay order (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.

CM APPLs. 422/2021 & CM APPLs. 423/2021(for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of.

W.P.(C) 138/2021 & CM APPL. 421/2021 (for interim relief)

3. The Petitioner in the present petition challenges the impugned order dated 17th December, 2020, passed by the Director, Financial Intelligence Unit-India, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. By the impugned order, the Petitioner has been held to be a "reporting entity" and a "payment system operator", under Section 2 (1)(wa) and Section 2 (1)(rc) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter, `PML Act'). Further, the impugned order finds the Petitioner guilty of violations under the provisions of the PML Act and has imposed a penalty amounting to Rs.96 L

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top