SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Tarun Khanna – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir based on mutually settled disputes. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. issuance and acceptance of notice leading to final disposal. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's inclination to quash fir due to lack of purpose. (Para 9)
4. legal basis for fir quashing. (Para 10)
5. formal conclusion and order of the court. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

Crl. M.A. 17/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.8/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.509/2017 dated 09.11.2017 registered at Police Station Kalkaji and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 20.07.2015. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioner and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 01.05.2017.

7. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement Agreement dated 05.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top