Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Harmunish Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's settlement leads to quashing of fir. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. respondent no. 2 consents to quashing fir. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's reasoning for quashing based on no utility. (Para 11) |
| 4. final order quashing the fir. (Para 12 , 13) |
Crl.M.A.4609-11/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Applications stand disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 915/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction for quashing of FIR No.148/2016, registered at Police Station CWC Nanakpura, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Petitioner and respondent No.2 got married on 20.04.2012. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioner and respondent no.2, they started living separately from July, 2016.
8. Petitioner and respondent No.2 entered into an ami
A court may quash an FIR when the parties have amicably settled their disputes and continued prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An FIR can be quashed when the parties reach an amicable settlement and express no intent to prosecute further, as it serves no useful purpose to continue legal proceedings.
The Court may quash FIR proceedings when parties reach an amicable settlement, ensuring that further prosecution serves no purpose.
Court can quash FIR if parties reach amicable settlement and complainant wishes not to pursue charges, indicating no useful purpose in prosecution.
Court has the authority to quash FIRs in light of amicable settlements between parties, prioritizing resolution over prosecution.
Court may quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement, and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of FIRs when no useful purpose is served by prosecution.
Quashing of FIR is justified when parties settle amicably and the complainant chooses not to pursue the prosecution, emphasizing the importance of the complainant's consent in criminal proceedings.
The court can quash an FIR when both parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
The court can quash an FIR when the parties have amicably settled their disputes, asserting that no useful purpose would be served by continuing prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
