SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT) of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed for quashing fir. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. parties entered into amicable settlement. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. no purpose served in prosecuting further. (Para 9)
4. fir quashed based on settlement. (Para 10)
5. petition allowed and disposed. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

Crl. M.A. 3053/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.621/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.80/2017 dated 07.07.2017 registered at Police Station CAW Cell- Nanakpura and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 who is present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.06.2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 15.11.2015.

7. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and rela

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top